U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he made a deal with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Washington would stop $4 billion US in annual funding to Israel after this year, but will still sell weapons to its close Middle East ally.
In a surprise announcement as U.S. voters headed to the polls for midterm elections that will decide whether Trump’s Republicans will lose control of Congress, Trump cast the move as partly meant to take away a “bad talking point” he said left-wing Democrats had used against Republicans over support for military assistance to Israel.
Trump did not provide details or explain how the funding would be halted at the end of the year, given that the memorandum of understanding that provides $3.8 billion in U.S. military aid to Israel each year does not expire until September 2028.
But he seemed to acknowledge that aid to Israel, no longer the solid source of bipartisan consensus it had been for decades, had become a political liability for him among some voters. Analysts suggested his declaration was timed as an Election Day ploy.
Discussions have been under way on how Washington’s assistance to Israel would evolve beyond 2028, and Netanyahu had already said he expects U.S. aid to wind down over time.
Trump, however, appeared to signal that his mind was made up about what would mark a significant shift in U.S.-Israel relations, even as the two countries remain in conflict with Iran more than eight months after jointly attacking the Islamic Republic.
Trump told Fox News’ Fox & Friends program that Israel no longer needed the funding and that some Democrats and left-wing politicians were using the financial support to criticize Republicans. Opinion polls show that the U.S. public’s overall support for Israel has declined mostly due to the Gaza war.
“Now, as far as paying Israel, Bibi Netanyahu and I have made a deal that we give Israel $4 billion [US] a year, and we made a deal months ago that we’re stopping,” Trump said. “We’ve already agreed that by the end of this year we won’t be paying Israel. Now, we’ll help Israel if they need it.”
Israel’s future leadership is uncertain after an Oct. 27 election in which Netanyahu — who has allied himself tightly with the U.S. Republicans — lost his governing majority but denied his opponents a clear path to unseat him. The election results paved the way for what are expected to be protracted negotiations over a new government.
Neither the White House nor Netanyahu’s office responded to Reuters’ requests for comment.
But Gadi Eisenkot, the leader of the rival bloc seeking to oust Netanyahu, wrote on X: “The fact that the security establishment, along with Israeli citizens, is learning about a change in the strategic relationship framework through the media highlights just how much Benjamin Netanyahu’s conduct poses a genuine danger. We can no longer rely on him and must replace him.”
Criticism of Israel
U.S. public support for Israel has fallen, particularly among Democrats, since Israel’s harsh response in Gaza to the deadly Hamas-led cross-border attack in October 2023.
A Quinnipiac University poll in June found 48 per cent of voters and 66 per cent of Democrats believe the U.S. is too supportive of Israel — up from 16 per cent and 20 per cent, respectively, when the question was first asked in 2017.
Polls and nonpartisan analysts say that Democrats are likely to wrest control of the House of Representatives from Trump’s Republican Party in Tuesday’s elections. Control of the Senate remains uncertain.
A number of candidates critical of Israel won Democratic primaries over the past year, and even moderate lawmakers have been increasingly willing to challenge long-time U.S. support.
In a key battleground race, Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed is vying to represent Michigan in the Senate. El-Sayed, who would become the first Muslim to serve as a U.S. senator, has opposed unconditional military aid to Israel.
Trump said the left used the U.S. funding as a “signal of unfairness” and that he could not allow that to happen. He specifically mentioned El-Sayed when explaining why he said Washington was stopping the money.
“Because they [Israel] don’t need it, and because why should we suffer the slings from lunatics like an El-Sayed when they don’t need it?” Trump said. “It’s a bad talking point.”
Some members of Trump’s Make America Great Again movement have also become increasingly critical of Israel, accusing it of having misled the president — who campaigned on a promise to avoid foreign interventions — into believing Iran could easily be defeated. Polls show most Americans oppose the war, which has driven up U.S. gasoline prices and pushed down Trump’s approval ratings.
“The curious issue is timing,” said Jon Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think-tank in Washington. “Why did President Trump announce it on Election Day? And why did he announce it amidst speculation that a major joint U.S.-Israeli military strike against Iran may be days away?”
While some U.S. supporters of Israel urged Trump to reconsider and instead phase out the funding gradually, Rep. Ro Khanna, a progressive Democrat from California, said on X that “Zero aid Israel” would be part of his party’s agenda if it wins congressional control.
Meanwhile, Republican Rep. Don Bacon told CNN: “What I really had heartburn about is the Israelis didn’t know about it.”
Congress passed a law in 2020 authorizing the funding for Israel, but the Senate and House must still pass appropriations bills every year to distribute and release the funds.
Netanyahu said in an interview with an Israeli television channel in October: “If you think we’re going to continue receiving what I secured twice, and that’s tens of billions of dollars in American aid for the defence budget, prepare yourselves and get used to the fact that it won’t happen, because America has changed.”
In anticipation of the possible reduction of U.S. financial support in the coming years, the House this past summer passed a defence bill provision that would deepen U.S.-Israeli military technology ties.
The provision of the 2027 National Defence Authorization Act, known as Section 219, envisions a much deeper defence co-operation between the two countries. Dozens of NGOs have called the idea “exceptionally dangerous” and urged U.S. lawmakers to scrap it.
Source: www.cbc.ca
