Elon Musk said on Sunday that Grok (SPCX) users would run up against usage limits more quickly than normal because servicing Grok Bot has become too expensive.
“The cost of serving Grok Bot was unsustainably high relative to revenue,” Musk wrote on his social media platform, X.
The sudden throttling highlights one of the biggest questions swirling around the AI revolution: whether demand from users will be enough to sustain a business. It turns out, at least in Musk’s case, that demand isn’t the problem. The cost is.
Musk was responding to an X user complaining that their Grok Bot usage jumped to 100% before their reset date, when typically they never reached their cap while using the AI agent.
136.37 +1.65 (+1.22%)
At close: November 2 at 4:00:00 PM EST
136.92 +0.55 (+0.40%)
SPCX TSLA
User demand is just one side of the AI market equation, and the businesses churning out sophisticated and expensive models have to — or will have to, eventually — generate revenue to cover their heightened costs. The economics of the still-new and messy AI industry suggest that even healthy demand can’t always sustain the AI tools they’re selling. Not at these prices — for the users (cheap) and for the corporate compute (expensive; just look at the computing bills).
That’s why the revenue question is increasingly critical and why Musk’s admission is so significant. The AI business is running into real-world limitations.
Musk suddenly changing Grok subscriptions so that the AI-usage meter runs faster has struck users and tech observers as unfair and worrisome for SpaceX’s business.
“Two weeks ago Grok Bot was an incredible success story powering SpaceXai’s revenue growth. Now it’s unsustainable and loses money (???)”, wrote former xAI worker Benjamin De Kraker in a post on X. Other commenters pointed to a bold and now ironic post Musk sent out a few days ago, saying, “Saving money for the distant future is pointless with the advent of super intelligent abundance.”
The tenor of the comments on Musk’s own platform, filled with Grok users, turned noticeably sharp: “Yet another Elon rug-pull.”
Musk, as he does, is posting through it.
“Just being sensible,” he wrote on X, in response to a comment suggesting that investors would punish SpaceX for the decision. In fact, shares are up 5% on Monday. And why shouldn’t they be? Wall Street has always loved fiscal responsibility and capitalizing on demand.
Another way to think through the change is that Musk was simply offering an introductory rate to hook users.
Perhaps AI subscriptions are going through their own version of the “VC subsidy,” popularized when Uber, Lyft, and other venture-backed apps offered discounts and super-low rates to boost adoption and engagement, only for the apps to sharply increase prices once users became reliant on the services. The classic introductory rate strategy.
Grok, a user might ask, is that true?
Follow Hamza Shaban on X @hshaban.
Click here for the latest technology news that will impact the stock market
Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance
Source: finance.yahoo.com
